When is it okay to leave your reader behind? by Gerhard Gehrke #SciFi @Goddessfish

VBT_ABeginnersGuideToInvadingEarth_Banner copyI’ve read science fiction novels for most of my reading years. It started with Madeleine L’Engle’s A Wrinkle in Time. This book is both deep and accessible for a younger reader. The same cannot be said about all science fiction.

When I saw 2001: A Space Odyssey (Kubrick, 1968), the novel by Arthur C Clarke came next. Hopefully some clarity would come, as the film and its enigmatic ending can defy explanation or understanding. What comes through on the page, though, is that Mr. Clarke knew his science, and I (both today and as a youth) don’t know it as well as he did. Arthur C. Clarke held degrees in math and physics, and has written on both subjects. This means that when he touches on orbital mechanics and thrust maneuvers, I have to take his word that he is correct in his details. The end portion of the book is both different and clearer than the film.

Yet both 2001 the film and the book are classics and are not diminished by their advanced storytelling that leave some wondering what, exactly, they are watching or reading. There are many examples of novels where the writer knows more than the reader and is flexing her mental muscles. It’s up to us as readers to decide if we mind going along for the ride. The caution for a writer seeking an audience is that sometimes the reader might give up. The counterpoint is that a dumbing down of an idea for the sake of simplicity can rob a work of its character.

A more recent example of a novel with portions that confound is Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash, which has sections on Sumerian mythology and linguistics that can be a challenge to read. Yet it’s because the author has such big ideas and is trying to explain his unique universe that these sections are endurable and worth struggling through to understand the entire story.

So as either writers or readers, we seek a level of clarity that doesn’t come at the cost of a story’s substance. Literature needs texture much as certain foods do. A term used by chefs is “toothsome,” which is when something has a chew but can’t be critiqued for being chewy. Language and information that make it to the page can’t be so sanded down that it becomes beige prose, yet it needs to not present an obstacle that cannot be cleared.

Yet no two readers are exactly alike. Some will persevere in the face of a challenge while others will give up. One point I keep in mind when reading is that some writers don’t care if their plot suffers for the sake of the rest of the narrative.

Consider the novelist Raymond Chandler. When the film adaptation of The Big Sleep was being filmed by Howard Hawks, it was discovered that one of the murders in the book was never explained and perhaps didn’t even make sense. Chandler’s response is classic. He didn’t know who the murderer was, and it didn’t matter to him. The characters and the overall situation came first in his story, and he felt confident that the screen version could survive with this unanswered element.

It would never be a good idea for a writer to set out writing with this attitude. But patient readers will make it through a vague or missing plot point or a section that goes above their heads because they value the rest of the work. Sometimes the understanding comes later upon reflection or research. Sometimes it means we go online to find out what, exactly, we just read and if we’re the only one who had a hard time puzzling through a book.


What would you do if you found a dead alien on a lonely highway?

MediaKit_BookCover_ABeginnersGuideToInvadingEarthWas it an accident, sabotage, or murder? And why is everyone blaming Jeff?

The extraterrestrials aren’t waiting for answers. They want revenge. And Jeff isn’t ready for company.

His only hope is an outcast mechanic from another world and a woman who might do anything to get off planet, including selling out her own kind. Jeff has to get to the bottom of why there are so many alien bodies piling up and who is really responsible.

A science fiction adventure novel, A Beginner’s Guide to Invading Earth tells the story of a reclusive ex-computer programmer who is the unwitting central figure of a plot to keep humanity from ever making first contact.



Barnes and Noble

Also available on iBooks



Jeff fought to breathe as he spun about in Whistleʹ s tightening grasp. He saw the Grey standing calmly by, an odd smile on its tiny, noseless face. It was transfixed by the action and violence. As Whistleʹ s swathe through the ranks of the Clyptus grew, the Grey tittered.

“Hi,” Jordan said to the Grey.

It hadn’t seen her approach. It was too focused on the brawl. Jordan punched the short alien. The Greyʹ s head snapped back, and its big eyes fluttered. The Grey crumpled, its weapon flying out of its hand. Before it lost consciousness, it released the scent of rotten eggs.

“And here I thought you liked me,” Jordan said.

Meanwhile, Oliop jumped on Whistle and latched onto her head with arms and legs and tail, blinding her. She grabbed at him. When she did, the remaining Clyptus struck at her. They moved over their stomped, battered, and torn companions and stabbed away at the rocky creature. Their darts and stickers poked uselessly at her hardened exterior. Some shot her with their energy weapons, but the yellow beams did nothing. All the while, Jeff wrestled and clawed at Whistleʹ s thick arm, but he couldʹ t break free.



Gerhard Gehrke will be awarding a $10 Amazon/BN GC to a randomly drawn winner via rafflecopter during the tour.

a Rafflecopter giveaway


AUTHOR Bio and Links:

MediaKit_AuthorPhoto_ABeginnersGuideToInvadingEarthGerhard Gehrke studied film at San Francisco State University. He wrote and produced several shows for community television. His Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror short stories have appeared in several publications, including an Editor’s Choice-winning short story at AnotheRealm.com. A Beginner’s Guide to Invading Earth is his first novel.
You can connect with him at Gerhardgehrke.com.

Twitter: https://twitter.com/gerhardgehrke
Facebook: www.facebook.com/gerhardgehrkeauthor
Blog: www.capriciousnarrator.wordpress.com/


Link to YouTube Trailer:

7 thoughts on “When is it okay to leave your reader behind? by Gerhard Gehrke #SciFi @Goddessfish

  1. Thanks for hosting!

  2. Mai T.

    What was the last movie you went to? What did you think?

  3. Thank you so much for having me today! An open question to your readers: When do you find time to read? I’ve noticed with myself that anything left to bedtime better not be anything too heavy, or I will retain little and wake up the next morning needing to backtrack and reread.

  4. Lisa Brown

    Thank you for the chance to win and happy new year 🙂

  5. Betty W

    I really enjoyed the excerpt! This sounds like a terrific book, thank you for sharing! I usually read at night and I have had to re-read, too. Sometimes, I read on my Kindle as I use my treadmill. That makes the exercise a little less painful!

    • I’ve tried reading when running on a treadmill..failed! You are more skilled than I!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.